Tag Archives: Hegel

Mythology, Madness, and Laughter: Subjectivity in German Idealism

As we are approaching the times, where, according to some bright contemporary minds (Adrian Johnston, Catherine Malabou) to name a couple the debt of biology which according to Freud should explain psychoanalysis, is either being paid or close to it, the question of subjectivity: what is it, really, is re-surging with full force. Adrian Johnston bases his transcendental materialism on a presentation of this very problem and its solution in a couple of must-read books (1 2). There, he engages with modern thinkers on this issue (among other things).

 Mythology, Madness, and Laughter: Subjectivity in German Idealism is a joint effort by Markus Gabriel and Slavoj Žižek, where the issues are tackled from a slightly different angle. Unlike Johnston, for whom, in the crudest of terms, the rise of subjectivity occurs in the register of the Lacanian Real, Gabriel would question the very “real” status of this Real to begin with. In that sense, he is much closer to Žižek, who, in The Parallax View states that the radical materialism must start with the Hegelian concept of Notion (“a truly radical materialist approach … to put it in Hegelese, there is the Particular because the Universal is not fully itself; there is the opaque material reality because the Notion is not fully itself…” Parallax View, The Comedy of Incarnation). On a personal note: I find this anti-Leninist turn most gratifying.

A great feature of this book is Žižek’s chapter on Fichte. I am not going to try and do it justice in a blog entry. Suffice it to say, that importance of Fichte’s thought is only matched by the thoroughness of misunderstanding of it. Žižek boldly battles the dragons of Fichte’s perceived solipsism. It is not that he presents a “new” understanding of Fichte’s philosophy. He presents a “real” understanding of it, reminding us once again about the platonic difference between “philosophia” and “doxophilia”. The “doxa” in this case being the basic adoption of a false reduction of Fichte’s system by Mme de Stael to a story of baron Munchausen, who pulled himself across the river by his sleeve.

Comments Off on Mythology, Madness, and Laughter: Subjectivity in German Idealism

Filed under Philosophy

” Žižek proceeds to connect this to a certain Lacanian version of the death drive…: insofar as the denaturalization of nature brought about by the sociocultural overwriting of vital being involves the colonization of the living (i.e., organic body) by the dead (i.e., the symbolic order), one could say, following Hegel and Lacan, that human life is lived under the dominance of lifeless set of cadaverizing signifiers (for instance, memes as mental parasites). Infection by virulent strains of virus-like signifiers is contracted by the individual in the process of struggling to gentrify and mask the abyssal darkness of the void of $ subsisting within substance.”

Adrian Johnston, Žižek’s Ontology p. 188

Leave a comment

November 2, 2013 · 3:06 PM

Hegelian Myths

I found a section on debunking “hegelian myths” on, I think hegel.com. The myths include Hegel rejecting the law of excluded middle, his saying that we live at the end of arts, philosophy, times… And next to each myth were a few sentences explaining why it is not true.

I think such “debunking” does more harm than good. First of all only a petit bourgeois mentality would seriously engage in believing the above mentioned (by “believing” I mean taking it literally and stopping there: Hegel does say that we live at the end of philosophy, time, etc). Intellectual curiosity is precisely what would motivate a true seeker of knowledge to immerse himself in hegelian philosophy to try and answer for himself why one of the most influential thinkers in the history of mankind would allow himself the luxury of such superfluous nonsense. That would lead to many a wonderful discovery, and en route, these boring “myths” will be explicated.

It is the very attempt to dispel it that really creates this kind of drivel. Any universal thought taken out of its context and split into individual parts will display the same nature, just like in the famous tale about an elephant examined by several blind people. When sensations like “elephant is a cord”, or “elephant is a pillar” are expressed, we do not try to disprove them individually “heads on”. We just demonstrate the whole elephant and the falsehoods simply wither out and fall off. In order to do that we must also cure blindness. In this case – intellectual blindness.

Leave a comment

Filed under Hegel, Philosophy

Гегель, диалектика

Дядя из хорошего университета объясняет в он-лайн лекции людям гегелевскую диаликтику за 10 минут. Вот, говорит, в юности вы хотели стать космонавтом, потом немного подросли и решили стать, там, профессором – это, ребята, тезис и анти-тезис. А потом вы совсем выросли и стали парикмахером. Это – синтез. Вы, говорит, можете много таких вещей взять, отфроматировать их в тезис, антитезис, синтез и теперь вы знаете что такое гегелевская диалектика.

Это конечно же ужас. Не говорю, что Гегель был затронут лишь как необходимая веха на пути к Марксу. Маркс. Какое дикое уныние! Ну да бог с ним. Гегелевская диалектика не состит из тезиса-анти-тезиса-синтеза. Это выдумки советских марксистов ради адаптации глубины гегелевской мысли к средним умам. Диалектика у Гегеля – внутреннее свойство концепции, постоянно развивающейся в ходе своего существования. Диалектика – это то, что увидит наблюдатель, отслеживающий развитие идеи от концепции до воплощения, это и есть само описание этого движения. Взять концепцию Бытия – самая пустая, абстрактная концепция. Только пустота и абстракция собственно и есть. И все же оно всегда в основе чего-то конкретно существующего. Каким образом? В своем развитие бытие проходит через “становление” (чем-то конкретным), это самое “становление” состоит из бытия и его отрицания одновременно: для того чтобы стать “чем-то”, нужно “что-то другое” отвергнуть . Omnis determinatio est negatio (Спиноза) – всякое определение есть отрицание. Это самое становление и есть единение бытия и небытия, позволяющее прийти к конкретно существующей веще (Dasein).

Leave a comment

Filed under Note, Philosophy